Stewardship Request Template (Sara / Daniel / Draco / PeterGate)

1. Purpose

This template standardizes Stewardship Requests so that all four stewards (Sara, Daniel, Draco, PeterGate) receive the context they need without guesswork, in alignment with the Stewardship Model and Governance Standard.

It is a WebKernel template (Layer-3), not Canon. It helps collaborators compose requests that respect role boundaries and prevent ambiguity.

2. Usage Instructions

  • Duplicate this template into a new file or message.
  • Replace bracketed fields [like this].
  • Keep language plain and non-inflated, per UICF and Ethics Standard.
  • Route to appropriate stewards based on the “Requested Stewards” section.

3. Request Header

From (Requester):

  • Name: [Your Name]
  • Role / Relationship: [Founder / Collaborator / Steward / etc.]
  • Date (UTC): [YYYY-MM-DD]

Subject:

  • [Short descriptive title, e.g., “Recenter Protocol Revision Request”]

Related Artifact(s):

  • UID(s): [PS-…] (if any)
  • Path(s): [C:\workspace\PortusSophia\…]

Requested Stewards:

  • Sara — Clarity / Tone / Interpretive Harmony
  • Daniel — Ratio–Fides Witness
  • Draco — Risk & Collapse Vectors
  • PeterGate — Boundary / Sealing Decision

4. Summary of the Request (Plain Language)

In 2–4 sentences, describe what you are asking for and why now.

Example:

“I am requesting a Stewardship review of the Recenter Protocol Pattern for tone and misuse risk before recommending it to external collaborators. I want to ensure it remains accessible, non-coercive, and aligned with PortusEthica™.” :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

5. Context & Background

5.1 Current State

  • What exists now?[Describe current document, pattern, decision, or situation.]
  • Where does it live? [Path, UID, layer according to MKH.]

5.2 Recent Events

  • [List any recent changes, conflicts, or incidents that triggered this request.]

6. Specific Steward Questions

Use only the sections relevant to your request.

6.1 For Sara (Harmonia)

  • What about the language, tone, or structure feels unclear or risky?[Your notes here.]
  • Are there phrases that might sound inflated, coercive, or dramatic?

6.2 For Daniel (Ratio–Fides)

  • What lived experience does this artifact or decision arise from?
  • Are you worried it might drift from embodied truth into narrative performance?

6.3 For Draco (Risk Steward)

  • What risks do you suspect (ethical, structural, reputational, relational)?
  • Are there collapse vectors you want Draco to model or forecast?

6.4 For PeterGate (Boundary Steward)

  • What boundary decision are you asking for? (e.g., approve, reject, delay, reclassify)
  • Does this touch Canon, Kernel, Governance, or IP boundaries?

7. Ethical Considerations (PortusEthica™)

Briefly describe how you believe this request aligns with PortusEthica™ and the Here and Now! constraint.

Prompt questions:

  • Are you seeking responsibility over authority?
  • Are you avoiding cruelty in how this will impact others?
  • Are you present and sincere, not performative?

8. Desired Outcome & Time Sensitivity

Preferred Outcome(s):

  • [e.g., “Approve for Kernel-layer sealing” / “Return with revision notes” / “Escalate to Canon discussion.”]

Time Sensitivity:

  • [Blocking / Important but not blocking / Long-term refinement]

Explain briefly why.

9. Attachments / Links

  • [List links or paths to related documents, diagrams, or threads.]

Here and Now! Principium: Memoria Corporalis

Back to top

PortusSophia Governance-Driven Development